Insights
Who this isn’t for: an honest look at fit
If a peer advisory group is genuinely vetted, it should say no as often, and as honestly, as it says yes.
Leo Judkins, Founder, The iGaming Leader · September 2026
Most content about a programme like ours is written to convince you to join. This one isn’t. If a peer advisory group is genuinely vetted, it should say no as often, and as honestly, as it says yes. Here’s what that actually looks like from the inside.
The early-stage founder
A recent applicant had left a senior role at a major industry vendor a couple of months earlier to build his own business, split between an early-stage consumer product and a consulting practice. Both were genuinely promising. Neither was generating meaningful revenue yet. He was smart, self-aware, and clearly a strong operator, and he was honest that he was still figuring out exactly what he was building.
The maths on a programme like ours has to work for the person joining it, not just for us. The logic is simple: if the annual cost of membership can’t plausibly return ten times its value inside the year, it isn’t worth the person’s money, whatever else they’d get out of it. At his stage, with revenue still forming and the business potentially pivoting several times over the next twelve months, that bar wasn’t realistic yet. The honest answer was to say so directly rather than take the sign-up.
There’s a second reason it wasn’t the right fit yet, and it’s more subtle than revenue. The other members he’d be sitting alongside are mostly running businesses with tens or hundreds of employees, facing an entirely different category of problem: organisational structure, market-level competitive threats, succession. Those problems are real and the input is smart, but the way an executive running a hundred-person business thinks about a decision is structurally different from how someone running a three-person startup needs to think. Different weekly cadence, different stakes, different kind of help required. Forcing that mismatch doesn’t make either side worse off exactly, but it dilutes the value for both, and it isn’t why either party is there.
The honest advice in that conversation wasn’t “come back never.” It was “come back once revenue and direction are clearer, and in the meantime, a monthly or quarterly touchpoint at an event does more for you right now than a weekly commitment would.”
The good fit who still said no
Fit isn’t only about stage. Sometimes someone is a strong match on paper, clearly capable, clearly in the right kind of business, clearly the sort of person other members would learn from, and they still say no. One recent applicant, a highly experienced operator building his own platform business, engaged thoughtfully with the whole process, compared it fairly to other peer structures he’d been part of previously, and ultimately decided the investment didn’t make sense for where his business was allocating its resources at that moment.
That’s a legitimate outcome too, and it’s worth saying plainly: a “no” from someone who’s genuinely thought it through isn’t a failure of the sales conversation. It’s exactly what an honest vetting process should produce sometimes. The alternative, saying yes to everyone regardless of fit or readiness, is how “vetted” communities quietly stop meaning anything.
Why this matters if you’re evaluating any group like this
If you’re looking at joining any peer advisory group or mastermind, the presence of a real “no” is one of the clearest signals of whether the vetting is genuine. A programme that accepts everyone who can pay isn’t protecting the thing that makes it valuable in the first place: a room of people at a genuinely comparable level, with comparable stakes, who can actually help each other.
So ask directly, of any group you’re considering: what does it look like when someone applies and isn’t the right fit? A group with a clear, honest answer to that question is a group that’s protecting what makes it worth joining.
Where this changes
If you’re running a business with real weight behind it and nobody neutral to put a decision in front of, the fit conversation is worth having. If you’re not there yet, the honest answer will be not yet, and you’ll hear it plainly.
See how the Inner Circles workQuestions this usually raises
At what stage of business is this mastermind the wrong fit?
Typically pre-revenue or very early-revenue businesses, where the return on a full membership can’t realistically be justified yet, and where the weekly cadence of a structured peer group isn’t the most useful use of a founder’s limited time.
Does saying no to an applicant mean the door is closed permanently?
No. Businesses grow and stages change. The honest answer is often “not yet,” with a suggestion for what to do in the meantime, rather than a permanent rejection.
Is it normal for a good-fit applicant to still decline?
Yes, and that’s a healthy sign rather than a concerning one. A genuine “no” from someone who has properly weighed it up shows the evaluation process on both sides is honest.
Keep reading
Peer advisory groups for iGaming executives: a buyer’s guide
What actually makes a peer advisory group worth your time, and what you should be sceptical of before you commit.
Read →Mastermind vs executive coaching: what senior iGaming leaders actually need
Not a competing product. Two different problems, and conflating them is why some leaders think this base is covered when it isn’t.
Read →